如何挽劝老公结扎？
國家希望各人多抚育。
结扎要公费了。
第三章： 结扎（输卵管摘除）的肾衰竭和后遗症输卵管摘除是一类男性优生体例，它割断尿液里卵子的供给。
通过切割和密封照顾卵子的管道来完成的。输卵管摘除呈现问题的信誉风险较低，一般来说能在急诊情况下展开部分麻醒。
在做输卵管摘除之前，必要确定此后不应正式成为孩子的母亲。
固然输卵管摘除有可能逆转，但输卵管摘除应被视为一类永久性的男性生育控造体例。
输卵管摘除不供给对性传布病毒传染的庇护。
输卵管复通是一类平安而有效率的优生优先选择，适用于那些确定此后不应正式成为孩子母亲的男性。
输卵管摘除在避免临蓐方面几乎百分之百有效率。
输卵管摘除是一类急诊术后，肾衰竭或副感化的信誉风险较低。
输卵管摘除的办事费远远低于男性结扎（输卵管结扎）的办事费或男性长年服用优生药物的办事费。
输卵管摘除意味着你不必要在性爱前采纳优生办法，如戴上平安套。
输卵管摘除做为男性长年结扎办法，截至2006年，全世界有近4300万男性回绝承受了输卵管摘除。大洋洲、北美洲、亚洲部门地域和西欧的输卵管摘除率更高，尤其是不丹（14%）、加拿大（15%）、新西兰（19%）和英国（20%）。
最常用的两种术后控造手艺是剖开法和无术后刀输卵管摘除（NSV）。
现代的剖开法必要用术后刀在睾丸上加两个或两个圆孔，而NSV则利用尖利的夹子刺破皮肤。
与现代剖开控造手艺比拟，NSV手产后的临床肾衰竭（如内出血、出血和病毒传染）信誉风险明显增加，术后天数更短，能更快地恢复性爱。NSV的产后早期肾衰竭比现代输卵管摘除TGP50。世界卫生组织（WHO）保举NSV，那正正式成为全球尺度。
用于封堵输卵管的控造手艺次要包罗初步输卵管摘除、复通、软骨外科术后（FI）和滴术。
软骨外科术后是一类控造手艺，次要包罗将笼盖在输卵管上的鞘拉到两个断端，并将鞘缝合以逐渐构成两个天然的组织屏障。结扎和摘除加软骨外科术后比零丁结扎和摘除更有效率。软骨外科术后明显增加输卵管摘除的保存率（从12.7%降至5.9%）。滴法次要包罗利用热或电来销毁输卵管的微血管。热灼术比电灼术更受欢送，能削减滑膜和多发性增厚的灭亡率。
输卵管摘除的肾衰竭次要包罗
内出血逐渐构成、病毒传染、结扎失败、卵子滑膜、产后短期痉挛（结节痛、睾丸痛和射精痛）和慢性痉挛综合症输卵管摘除的长年平安性顾忌来自
心血管病症、脑癌或乳腺癌、产后长年丧失性腺、抗卵子抗原（AsAbs）逐渐构成等。输卵管摘除后的常见肾衰竭和产后办理 肾衰竭 发病率 备注 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 病毒传染和内出血 0.2%-1.5%/4%-22% 一般来说情况下，病毒传染是轻细的，并且仅限于圆孔足部。稀有的肾衰竭如Fournier出血性、犬心、淋凑趣炎瘘和血管皮下瘘，在少少数病人中已有报导[11,12]。内出血在手产后不久呈现[11]。 输卵管摘除后痉挛综合症 1%-14% 一般来说较轻。有些病例对生活量量有倒霉影响，有时必要展开痉挛治疗或术后[13]。 卵子滑膜 40% 产后2-3周可能发作在输卵管摘除的足部或附睾或睾丸网中[14]。 抗卵子抗原（本身免疫性病症） 信誉风险不削减 在回绝承受过输卵管摘除的男性中，几种免疫系统相关病症的信誉风险在很长一段天数内没削减[11]。 乳腺癌 不削减信誉风险 相关性很弱，没令人信服的生物学机造[11]。 性腺障碍 没削减信誉风险 迄今为行，大大都研究表白输卵管摘除不会影响性腺，以至能改善性腺。 心血管病症 不削减信誉风险 次要包罗BMI、胆固醇、甘油三酯、卵白量、白卵白、高密度脂卵白和球卵白的比例[11]。 生殖激素 不削减信誉风险 输卵管摘除后没明显变革。 卵子受损和将来临蓐的优先选择--输卵管摘除后卵子受损的水平与输卵管摘除后的天数有关；输卵管造口术和辅助生殖控造手艺是输卵管摘除后想要实现临蓐的夫妇的两个次要优先选择。 输卵管摘除后的尿液阐发和后续护理 - 8-16周是两个适宜的天数范畴；输卵管摘除后的病人要歇息24小时，7天内制止骑自行车。1. 病毒传染和内出血
病毒传染和内出血是输卵管摘除最常报导的肾衰竭。
一般来说，病毒传染的灭亡率在3%到4%之间， 个别报导中病毒传染灭亡率到达30%。
内出血的灭亡率次要从0%到29%不等，可回绝承受的比例是2%。
输卵管摘除肾衰竭的灭亡率各不不异，取决于医师每月施行的输卵管摘除的数量和术后控造手艺。美国的一项全国查询拜访陈述显示，每月展开输卵管摘除1-10次的医师的内出血灭亡率为4.6%，而每月展开输卵管摘除11-50次和50次以上的医师的内出血灭亡率别离为2.4%和1.6%。
术后控造手艺对病毒传染和内出血的灭亡率有明显影响。
目前，NSV因其肾衰竭（尤其是内出血和病毒传染）灭亡率低而被全世界普遍承认和回绝承受。
2. 输卵管摘除后痉挛综合症
输卵管摘除后痉挛综合症（PVPS）次要包罗持续或间歇性的睾丸不适/痉挛，持续天数至少3个月，没明白的附睾炎或其他明显的病理特征。
做为慢性睾丸痉挛的一类形式，PVPS是输卵管摘除最常见的晚期肾衰竭。
回忆性病例系列和前瞻性察看及随访研究表白，高达15%的男性在输卵管摘除后呈现慢性痉挛，有约2%的男性指出其影响了生活量量。PVPS发病的均匀天数为7-24个月。生齿统计学特征（年龄、社会经济地位和种族）和术后控造手艺没被证明与PVPS的发作有关。
PVPS的病理心理学仍然难以解释。
若是痉挛始末未缓解，能考虑术后干涉。
PVPS的次要术前方案次要包罗摘除结节、输卵管复通术（VR）、硬膜外摘除和精索显微外科（MDSC）。
顽固性痉挛病人的最初优先选择是睾丸摘除。
3. 卵子滑膜
卵子滑膜是输卵管摘除后的一类常见现象。
从动物研究来看，生殖细胞渗入附睾或输卵管空间会产生本身免疫和/或炎症反响，从而招致卵子滑膜的逐渐构成。
滑膜结节呈现在输卵管或附睾的末端，由退化的卵子中心部门构成，四周是一层上皮样巨噬细胞，淋巴细胞和浆细胞的松散结缔组织逐渐构成包裹。
卵子滑膜在产后2-3周发作。
一般来说不痛不痒，且大大都没症状。
关于输卵管摘除者，产后1周内不射能削减卵子滑膜逐渐构成的信誉风险。
若是症状持续存在，守旧治疗无效，可在炎症控造后，术后摘除痉挛部分和滴的结节，结扎输卵管残端，往往能制止复发。
4. 抗卵子抗原
输卵管摘除招致卵子抗原表露在免疫系统中，那将刺激抗卵子的本身免疫反响。
动物研究发现能招致卵子凝固和激活补体级联反响，免疫复合物由此逐渐构成并堆积在基底膜上。
输卵管摘除后被梗塞，一定招致尿液堆积，生殖管内压力削减，附睾管扩张，因为卵子漏出或刺激附睾内皮细胞而逐渐构成卵子滑膜。招致内皮细胞对卵子的吸收削减，吞噬感化加强，刺激敏感的免疫系统从而产生免疫反响。
超越60%的男性在输卵管摘除后6-8周内呈现卵子抗原。约7%-30%的输卵管摘除病人的附睾中也有卵子抗原。
那是因为血睾屏障被毁坏。
免疫系统相关病症次要包罗强曲性脊柱炎、哮喘、糖尿病、炎症性肠病、多发性硬化症、重症肌无力、类风湿性关节炎和甲亢。
5. 输卵管摘除和乳腺癌
有报导称，输卵管摘除后乳腺癌的发病率表示出轻细的削减，但输卵管摘除后的灭亡率却明显增加。原因可能是优先选择输卵管摘除的男性更愿意按期回绝承受前列腺特异性抗原的检测，以便排除乳腺癌，那也与更安康的生活体例有关。然而，近年来大量的队列研究、系统回忆、前瞻性研究和横断面研究陈述的成果显示，输卵管摘除其实不削减乳腺癌的信誉风险。大大都正面成果显示，任何相关性都很弱，没令人信服的生物学机造。
6. 性腺障碍
大大都研究都表白输卵管摘除不会影响性腺。
男性对输卵管摘除的心理反响表白了两个次要的反响：对不测临蓐的焦虑削减，以及对输卵管摘除的感知 "去势 "展开抵偿的愿望。
有陈述显示，男性在输卵管摘除后更容易呈现抑郁和焦虑的症状......无法连结足够长的X起来完成性交。
7. 手产后的心血管病症
20世纪80年代，克拉克森和亚历山大报导，输卵管摘除能加速山公的动脉硬化的开展，初次提出了输卵管摘除和心血管病症之间的联络。Bhatia等人陈述说，回绝承受输卵管摘除的兔子血清中的胆固醇和甘油三酯程度大幅削减。
8. 生殖激素
早期的动物尝试表白，输卵管摘除后短天数内（约三个月）睾酮程度暂时下降，可能是因为输卵管摘除后血睾屏障的动态平衡被毁坏，附睾及其构造受损，功用受损，招致部分白介素-1程度削减。白介素-1程度削减后，人绒毛膜促性腺激素对Leydig细胞排泄睾丸激素的感化按捺，招致血睾丸激素程度短暂下降。
然而，以前对动物和人类研究的长年证据表白，输卵管摘除其实不影响生殖激素[83]。近年来的研究成果表白，成年大鼠输卵管摘除后，睾丸的内排泄功用在短期内没遭到影响，输卵管摘除后血浆中黄体生成素（LH）、卵泡刺激素和睾酮的浓度没明显变革[28]。在中国对485名回绝承受输卵管摘除的男性和1940名未回绝承受输卵管摘除的男性的查询拜访显示，两组的LH和游离睾酮程度以及睾酮排泄指数没明显差别，但总睾酮程度有明显差别（P=0.02）[73]。那些成果也表白，输卵管摘除其实不削减晚期性腺功用减退症的发病信誉风险。
因而，我们得出结论，输卵管摘除后，睾丸生殖激素会在短天数内削减，但会渐渐恢复到一般程度，那对想再次临蓐的病人来说是个好动静。
9. 卵子受损和将来临蓐的优先选择
输卵管摘除后的天数越长，对尿液量量和生育才能的负面影响就越大。
输卵管摘除后的卵子受损水平与输卵管摘除后的天数有关。输卵管摘除后的天数越长，对尿液量量和生育才能的负面影响就越大。ONeill等人陈述说，与可育须眉的卵子比拟，输卵管结扎超越5年的须眉的卵子产量明显下降，并且输卵管结扎后的卵子显示出DNA片段的削减（信誉风险）。
输卵管造口术（VV）和辅助生殖控造手艺（ART）是输卵管摘除后离婚后再婚夫妇的两个次要优先选择。VV能做为第一步，若是夫妇在VV后18个月内没天然临蓐，能接纳ART来削减临蓐的时机。
10. 输卵管摘除后的尿液阐发和后续护理
长年以来不断是两个争论的话题。
PVSA是输卵管摘除后病人随访的两个重要部门。
研究表白，输卵管摘除后12周检测尿液时，多达33%的病人没卵子。
美国泌尿外科协会指南（2012）建议，8-16周是展开PVSA的恰当天数范畴。
Griffin等人认为，PVSA应在产后3个月内优先展开，而且在此期间应有足够数量的射X（至少20次）。
一些研究认为，12周的PVSA比20次以上的射X后更可靠。
在12周时不克不及释放卵子的男性比例相较射X超越20次的男性高20%。
产后3-6个月, 尿液中呈现活动卵子被定义为早期再通，概率为0.36%。
如摘除的输卵管长度在5-20毫米范畴内，与再通的信誉风险无关。
如摘除的长度≥40毫米，则根本上不成能再通。
如随访6个月后仍有活动卵子，则应重做输卵管摘除。
固然输卵管复通的短期肾衰竭不容轻忽，如内出血、痉挛、病毒传染等，尤其是产后痉挛，少数病人可能末生受其困扰；同时，输卵管复通与本身免疫性病症、心血管病症、乳腺癌和性腺障碍的信誉风险没削减。但是仍然必要长年察看以获得更多证据。
ref
Barone MA, Hutchinson PL, Johnson CH, Hsia J, Wheeler J. Vasectomy in the United States, 2002. J Urol. 2006;176:232–236. discussion 236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] World contraceptive use 2007. New York: United Nations; 2008. [Google Scholar] Cook LA, Van Vliet H, Lopez LM, Pun A, Gallo MF. Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD003991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Cook LA, Pun A, van Vliet H, Gallo MF, Lopez LM. Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD004112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/RHR) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs (CCP), INFO Project. Family planning: a global handbook for providers. Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2007. pp. 183–198. [Google Scholar] Sokal D, Irsula B, Hays M, Chen-Mok M, Barone MA Investigator Study Group. Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2004;2:6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Chen-Mok M, Bangdiwala SI, Dominik R, Hays M, Irsula B, Sokal DC. Termination of a randomized controlled trial of two vasectomy techniques. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:78–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Schmidt SS, Minckler TM. The vas after vasectomy: comparison of cauterization methods. Urology. 1992;40:468–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Pant PR, Sharma J, Subba S. Scrotal haematoma: the most common complication of no-scalpel vasectomy. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2007;5:279–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Labrecque M, Nazerali H, Mondor M, Fortin V, Nasution M. Effectiveness and complications associated with 2 vasectomy occlusion techniques. J Urol. 2002;168:2495–2498. discussion 2498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Awsare NS, Krishnan J, Boustead GB, Hanbury DC, McNicholas TA. Complications of vasectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:406–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Cook LA, Van Vliet HA, Pun A, Gallo MF. Vasectomy techniques for male sterilization: systematic Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2431–2438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Honig S, Labrecque M, Marmar JL, Ross LS, et al. Vasectomy: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(6 Suppl):2482–2491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Dohle GR, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Giwercman A, Jungwirth A Grupo de Trabajo de la Asociación Europea de Urología sobre la Infertilidad Masculina. [European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy] Actas Urol Esp. 2012;36:276–281. Spanish. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Benger JR, Swami SK, Gingell JC. Persistent spermatozoa after vasectomy: a survey of British urologists. Br J Urol. 1995;76:376–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Nirapathpongporn A, Huber DH, Krieger JN. No-scalpel vasectomy at the Kings birthday vasectomy festival. Lancet. 1990;335:894–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Forste R, Tanfer K, Tedrow L. Sterilization among currently married men in the United States, 1991. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27:100–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Kols A, Lande R. Vasectomy: reaching out to new users. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs, INFO Project; 2008. [Google Scholar] Cook LA, Pun A, Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Van Vliet HA. Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD004112 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Goldstein M. Surgical management of male infertility and other scrotal disorders. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, editors. Campbells urology vol. 2. 7th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 1998. p. 6. [Google Scholar] Tan WP, Levine LA. An overview of the management of post-vasectomy pain syndrome. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:332–337. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Sabanegh ES, Thomas AJ. Microsurgical treatment of male infertility. In: Lipshultz L, Howards SS, Niederberger CS, editors. Infertility in the male. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 392–406. [Google Scholar] Tandon S, Sabanegh E., Jr Chronic pain after vasectomy: a diagnostic and treatment dilemma. BJU Int. 2008;102:166–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Sinha V, Ramasamy R. Post-vasectomy pain syndrome: diagnosis, management and treatment options. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 1):S44–S47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Lee JY, Cho KS, Lee SH, Cho HJ, Cho JM, Oh CY, et al. A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46:531–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Strom KH, Levine LA. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for chronic orchialgia: long-term results from a single center. J Urol. 2008;180:949–953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Su JS, Farber NJ, Feldman MK, Vij SC. Sperm granuloma masquerading as a supernumerary testis. Urol Case Rep. 2019;29:101080. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Dutta D, Park I, Guililat H, Sang S, Talapatra A, Hanson L, et al. Ethylene dimethane sulfonate (EDS) ablation of Leydig cells in adult rat depletes testosterone resulting in epididymal sperm granuloma: testosterone replacement prevents granuloma formation. Reprod Biol. 2019;19:89–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Pienkos EJ. The use of testosterone in the treatment of chronic postvasectomy pain syndrome: case report and review of the literature. Mil Med. 2007;172:676–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Seppan P, Krishnaswamy K. Long-term study of vasectomy in Macaca radiata--histological and ultrasonographic analysis of and duct system. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014;60:151–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Rayala BZ, Viera AJ. Common questions about vasectomy. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88:757–761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Lowe G. Optimizing outcomes in vasectomy: How to ensure sterility and prevent complications. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:176–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Liu XZ, Li SQ. Complications and long-term safety of vasectomy. J Int Reprod Health Fam Plan. 2009;28:390–393. [Google Scholar] Alexander NJ. Vasectomy: long-term effects in the rhesus monkey. J Reprod Fertil. 1972;31:399–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] McLachlan RI. Basis, diagnosis and treatment of immunological infertility in men. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;57:35–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Chehval MJ, Doshi R, Kidd CF, Winkelmann T, Chehval V. Antisperm autoantibody response after unilateral vas deferens ligation in rats: When does it develop? J Androl. 2002;23:669–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Barratt CL, Havelock LM, Harrison PE, Cooke ID. Antisperm antibodies are more prevalent in men with low sperm motility. Int J Androl. 1989;12:110–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Rajah SV, Parslow JM, Howell RJ, Hendry WF. The effects on in-vitro fertilization of autoantibodies to spermatozoa in subfertile men. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1079–1082. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] World Health Organization. WHO Manual for the standardized investigation, diagnosis and management of the infertile male. Cambrige: Cambirge University Press; 2006. pp. 11–46. [Google Scholar] Massey FJ, Jr, Bernstein GS, OFallon WM, Schuman LM, Coulson AH, Crozier R, et al. Vasectomy and health. Results from a large cohort study. JAMA. 1984;252:1023–1029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Goldacre MJ, Wotton CJ, Seagroatt V, Yeates D. Immune-related disease before and after vasectomy: an epidemiological database study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1273–1278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Millard PS. Review: Bias may contribute to association of vasectomy with prostate cancer. West J Med. 1999;171:91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Dennis LK, Dawson DV, Resnick MI. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis examining vasectomy status, age at vasectomy, and time since vasectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002;5:193–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Siddiqui MM, Wilson KM, Epstein MM, Rider JR, Martin NE, Stampfer MJ, et al. Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3033–3038. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Davenport MT, Zhang CA, Leppert JT, Brooks JD, Eisenberg ML. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer in a prospective US Cohort: data from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Andrology. 2019;7:178–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Husby A, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a 38-year nationwide cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112:71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Rohrmann S, Paltoo DN, Platz EA, Hoffman SC, Comstock GW, Helzlsouer KJ. Association of vasectomy and prostate cancer among men in a Maryland cohort. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:1189–1194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Seikkula H, Kaipia A, Hirvonen E, Rantanen M, Pitkäniemi J, Malila N, et al. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer in a Finnish nationwide population-based cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;64:101631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Liu LH, Kang R, He J, Zhao SK, Li FT, Wan SP, et al. Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Andrology. 2015;3:643–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Zhang XL, Yan JJ, Pan SH, Pan JG, Ying XR, Zhang GF. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:17977–17985. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Jacobs EJ, Anderson RL, Stevens VL, Newton CC, Gansler T, Gapstur SM. Vasectomy and prostate cancer incidence and mortality in a large US cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3880–3885. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Nayan M, Hamilton RJ, Macdonald EM, Li Q, Mamdani MM, Earle CC, et al. Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2016;355:i5546. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Shang Y, Han G, Li J, Zhao J, Cui D, Liu C, et al. Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9920. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Bhindi B, Wallis CJD, Nayan M, Farrell AM, Trost LW, Hamilton RJ, et al. The association between vasectomy and prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1273–1286. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Randall S, Boyd J, Fuller E, Brooks C, Morris C, Earle CC, et al. The effect of vasectomy reversal on prostate cancer risk: international meta-analysis of 684,660 vasectomized men. J Urol. 2018;200:121–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Smith K, Byrne, Castaño JM, Chirlaque MD, Lilja H, Agudo A, et al. Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1297–1303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] DeAntoni EP, Göktaş S, Stenner J, ODonnell C, Crawford ED. A cross-sectional study of vasectomy, time since vasectomy and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 1997;1:73–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Ferrís-I-Tortajada J, Berbel-Tornero O, Garcia-I-Castell J, López-Andreu JA, Sobrino-Najul E, Ortega-García JA. [Non dietetic environmental risk factors in prostate cancer] Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35:289–295. Spanish. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Bernal-Delgado E, Latour-Pérez J, Pradas-Arnal F, Gómez-López LI. The association between vasectomy and prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:191–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Holt SK, Salinas CA, Stanford JL. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2008;180:2565–2567. discussion 2567–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Nie Y, Liu CR, Guo XK, Yan KJ, Du D, Gao WY, et al. [Clinical study of long term effects of vasectomy on the incidence rate of prostate cancer] J Clin Urol. 2008;24:424–427. Chinese. [Google Scholar] Pereira S, Martinez M, Martinez FE, Júnior WM. Repercussions of castration and vasectomy on the ductal system of the rat ventral prostate. Cell Biol Int. 2006;30:169–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Leavesley JH. A study of vasectomized men and their wives. Aust Fam Physician. 1980;9:8–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Engl T, Hallmen S, Beecken WD, Rubenwolf P, Gerharz EW, Vallo S. Impact of vasectomy on the sexual satisfaction of couples: experience from a specialized clinic. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70:275–279. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Bertero E, Hallak J, Gromatzky C, Lucon AM, Arap S. Assessment of sexual function in patients undergoing vasectomy using the international index of erectile function. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31:452–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Guo DP, Lamberts RW, Eisenberg ML. Relationship between vasectomy and sexual frequency. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1905–1910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Shaik S, Rajkumar RP. Post-vasectomy depression: a case report and literature review. Ment Illn. 2014;6:5494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Clarkson TB, Alexander NJ. Long-term vasectomy: effects on the occurrence and extent of atherosclerosis in rhesus monkeys. J Clin Invest. 1980;65:15–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Bhatia ND, Chakravarti RN, Majumdar S. Immune response to spermatozoal antigens in vasectomized normal and atherogenic diet fed rabbits. Indian J Med Res. 1981;73:910–915. [Google Scholar] Coady SA, Sharrett AR, Zheng ZJ, Evans GW, Heiss G. Vasectomy, inflammation, atherosclerosis and long-term followup for cardiovascular diseases: no associations in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. J Urol. 2002;167:204–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Chi IC, Ko UR, Wilkens LR, Chang HK, Nam JJ. Vasectomy and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction: a hospital-based case-control study in Seoul, Korea. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19:32–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Mullooly JP, Wiest WM, Alexander NJ, Greenlick MR, Fulgham DL. Vasectomy, serum assays, and coronary heart disease symptoms and risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:101–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Zhao K, Wu L, Kong X, Chen Y, Li H, Gu Y, et al. Long-term safety, health and mental status in men with vasectomy. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Goldacre MJ, Wotton CJ, Seagroatt V, Yeates D. Cancer and cardiovascular disease after vasectomy: an epidemiological database study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1438–1443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Xiong SM, Zhou Y, Liu F, Shi Y, Yu Q, Dai L, et al. Long-term effects of vasectomy on lipid metabolism in aging males. Chin J Reprod Contracept. 2018;38:44–48. [Google Scholar] Guo ZL, Xu JL, Lai RK, Wang SS. Vasectomy and cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7852. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Guan HT, Qing XR, Zhang HP, Zhao K, Kong XG, Chen YP, et al. Effect of vasectomy on serum lipids, renal and hepatic function in middle-aged and elderly men. Chin J Fam Plan Gynecotokol. 2014;6:5–8. [Google Scholar] Zhu CC, Tang B, Su J, Zhao H, Bu X, Li Z, et al. Abnormal accumulation of collagen type I due to the loss of discoidin domain receptor 2 (Ddr2) promotes testicular interstitial dysfunction. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131947. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Duru FI, Ajayi S, Azu OO. The effect of unilateral vasectomy on testosterone and testicular parameters in the adult male African giant rat (Cricetomys gambianus) Afr Health Sci. 2013;13:483–489. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Hinz S, Rais-Bahrami S, Kempkensteffen C, Weiske WH, Miller K, Magheli A. Effect of obesity on sex hormone levels, antisperm antibodies, and fertility after vasectomy reversal. Urology. 2010;76:851–856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Aggerholm AS, Thulstrup AM, Toft G, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Bonde JP. Is overweight a risk factor for reduced semen quality and altered serum sex hormone profile? Fertil Steril. 2008;90:619–626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Zhou Y. Ultrasound diagnosis of epididymosis. J Med Imaging. 2010;20:197. [Google Scholar] Alexander NJ, Free MJ, Paulsen CA, Buschbom R, Fulgham DL. A comparison of blood chemistry, reproductive hormones and the development of antisperm antibodies after vasectomy in men. J Androl. 1980;1:40–50. [Google Scholar] Cook LA, Van Vliet HA, Lopez LM, Pun A, Gallo MF. Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD003991 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] ONeill DA, McVicar CM, McClure N, Maxwell P, Cooke I, Pogue KM, et al. Reduced sperm yield from testicular biopsies of vasectomized men is due to increased apoptosis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:834–841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Ghirelli-Filho M, Marchi PL, Mafra FA, Cavalcanti V, Christofolini DM, Barbosa CP, et al. Incidence of Y-chromosome microdeletions in children whose fathers underwent vasectomy reversal or in vitro fertilization with epididymal sperm aspiration: a case-control study. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2016;14:534–540. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] McVicar CM, ONeill DA, McClure N, Clements B, McCullough S, Lewis SE. Effects of vasectomy on spermatogenesis and fertility outcome after testicular sperm extraction combined with ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2795–2800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Urry RL, Heaton JB, Moore M, Middleton RG. A fifteen-year study of alterations in semen quality occurring after vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:341–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Belker AM, Thomas AJ, Jr, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol. 1991;145:505–511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Nicopoullos JD, Gilling-Smith C, Almeida PA, Ramsay JW. Effect of time since vasectomy and maternal age on intracytoplasmic sperm injection success in men with obstructive azoospermia after vasectomy. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:367–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Blok JM, van Roekel C, Oude Ophuis RJA, Lock TMTW. Open epididymal spermatozoa aspiration for obstructive azoospermia. Andrologia. 2019;51:e13218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Valerie U, De Brucker S, De Brucker M, Vloeberghs V, Drakopoulos P, Santos-Ribeiro S, et al. Pregnancy after vasectomy: surgical reversal or assisted reproduction? Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1218–1227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Mroue S, Delaloye JF, Wunder D. [New child wish after vasectomy: vasovasostomy or assisted reproductive medicine?] Rev Med Suisse. 2010;6:2030–2032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Smith AG, Crooks J, Singh NP, Scott R, Lloyd SN. Is the timing of post-vasectomy seminal analysis important? Br J Urol. 1998;81:458–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Griffin T, Tooher R, Nowakowski K, Lloyd M, Maddern G. How little is enough? The evidence for post-vasectomy testing. J Urol. 2005;174:29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Liu XZ, Li SQ. Progress in clinical application of vasectomy. Chin J Androl. 2006;(10):1–3. [Google Scholar] Korthorst RA, Consten D, van Roijen JH. Clearance after vasectomy with a single semen sample containing < than 100 000 immotile sperm/mL: analysis of 1073 patients. BJU Int. 2010;105:1572–1575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Bhuyan K, Ali I, Barua SJ. Role of no scalpel vasectomy in male sterilization. Indian J Surg. 2012;74:284–287. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Johnson D, Sandlow JI. Vasectomy: tips and tricks. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:704–709. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]..
Tags：